President Donald Trump’s purge at independent agencies is putting a target on a nearly 100-year-old Supreme Court precedent that protects certain officials from the political whims of the White House.

Laws governing several, lesser-known agencies protect certain officials from removal, except for cause. Trump is betting ...

President Donald Trump will need the Supreme Court, with three justices he appointed, to enable the most aggressive of the ...

Young contemplated voting against the confirmation of former Democratic congresswoman and presidential candidate Tulsi ...

One-third of the U.S. Supreme Court consists of Donald Trump appointees: Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett and Neil ...

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, appearing recently at the University of Louisville’s law school, was asked about eroding confidence ...

Attacked by two justices, lower-court judges and litigants, the 1964 ruling in New York Times v. Sullivan keeps getting cited ...

The most consequential of Trump's three victories at the court last year was a ruling authored by conservative Chief Justice ...

Trump’s executive order stripping federal workers of legal protections is the most dangerous of his unlawful power grabs. But ...

If the case reaches the Supreme Court, its conservative majority will be receptive to Donald J. Trump’s argument that ...

For the second year, half of Supreme Court cases involve the federal government as respondents or petitioners, a novel trend ...

Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital subscription to Yorkshire Post, you can get access to all of our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and ...